Sony Xperia 5 II Camera review: Good progress overall with excellent noise

The Xperia 5 II is Sony’s smaller and much more affordable option to the Xperia 1 II. For the part that is most the two devices share similar specifications. Packing a Snapdragon 865 chip, IP65/68 water resistance, and a 4000 mAh battery, the Xperia 5 II still falls within the flagship category. The main difference is the screen, with the Xperia 5 II featuring a 6.1-inch FHD+ HDR OLED display with 120 hz rate that is refresh. That’s not too shabby by any yardstick, it is not exactly during the exact same degree whilst the 6.5-inch 4K display for the Xperia 1 II.

In the photography division, the Xperia 5 II provides the exact same fundamental back triple-camera whilst the Xperia 1 II, but drops the depth-sensing iToF sensor that is 3D. The standard-wide that is main is built around a 12 MP 1/1.7-inch Exmor RS for mobile sensor, connected to a 24 mm-equivalent lens that is f/1.7-aperture a 82° field of view (FOV). The tele-camera also offers 12 MP but on a physically smaller 1/3.4-inch sensor, with a slightly darker f/2.4-aperture 70 mm-equivalent focal length lens that provides a FOV that is 34. The module that is third an ultra-wide that is again built around a 12 MP resolution on the 1/2.55-inch Exmor RS sensor, coupled to a 16 mm-equivalent lens that is f/2.2-aperture a 124° FOV.

Other features from Sony’s acclaimed mirrorless digital cameras have actually filtered right down to their flagship smart phones, too. Chief among these could be the eye that is real-time autofocus, which works on both people and animals. There’s also the Sony BIONZ X image processing engine, continuous burst shooting at 20 fps, and Zeiss optics with Zeiss T* lens coatings to reduce reflections. The 5 II also features a dedicated physical shutter button.

The like the Xperia 1 II smartphone captures video at 4K resolution up to 120 fps for slow-motion film recording, in addition to during the more standard 24/25/30 fps framework prices.

Let’s observe how the Xperia 5 II forms up for image quality against its bigger Xperia 1 II stablemate plus some for the other flagship competition.

  • Key digital camera specifications:
  • Primary: 12 MP 1/1.7-inch Exmor RS sensor, 24 mm-equivalent lens that is f/1.7-aperture 82° FOV
  • Ultra-wide: 12 MP 1/2.55-inch Exmor RS sensor, 16mm lens that is f/2.2-aperture 124° FOV
  • Tele-lens: 12 MP 1/3.4-inch sensor, 70 mm-equivalent f/2.4-aperture lens, 34° FOV

4K/2160p video at 24/25/30/60/120 fpsAbout DXOMARK Camera tests:

For scoring and analysis within our smartphone digital camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and assess over 3000 test pictures and much more than 2.5 hours of video both in managed lab surroundings plus in natural interior and outside scenes, utilising the camera’s standard settings. This informative article was created to emphasize the main outcomes of our evaluation. To learn more in regards to the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, just click here. More information on what we score smartphone digital cameras can be obtained right here.


Test summary

Sony Xperia 5 II

111

camera
114


picture

60


zoom

99

video clip

With a DXOMARK Camera rating of 111, the Sony Xperia 5 II provides comparable image that is overall to the Xperia 1 II at 112. It also shows development that is significant the first-generation Xperia 5, which scored 95 within our tests back January 2020.

Well-controlled sound with good information, generally speaking satisfying color, pleasant bokeh shots and accurate flash exposures aided the Xperia 5 II returning to an image rating of 114. That’s a improvement that is notable the original Xperia 5 at 101, but nonetheless ranking behind most of the flagship smartphone competition.

A Zoom score of 60 indicates a solid if not performance that is outstanding ultra-wide and tele-lens photography. Bold color at close range could be the strength that is main tele-lens shots, with the ultra-wide camera delivering generally accurate target exposures.

For video, the Xperia 5 II’s score of 99 is a couple of points behind the Xperia 1 II at 102. Key strengths continue to be noise that is good information, and color in interior and outdoor videos. Overall, nonetheless, both Sony products are just a little down the rate for video clip image quality in comparison to our devices that are top-ranked

Satisfying color with well-controlled noise are the Sony Xperia 5 II’s main strengths.

The Xperia 5 II records accurate target exposures in almost all lighting conditions, with images only noticeably underexposed in extreme light that is low. Dynamic range is quite restricted, nonetheless. Details are lost within the shows in many scenes that are high-contrast sometimes faces are underexposed.

Color rendering is a strength that is nice the Xperia 5 II. Periodically small undersaturation and a greenish hue to complexion rendering are obvious, however for the part colors that are most are vivid and pleasant. White balance leans towards a warm or cast that is yellow however it’s actually just problematic in low light, where it turns toward a stronger orange color.

Sony Xperia 5 II, restricted range that is dynamic high-contrast scenes

Sony Xperia 5 II, crop: low information

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, improved range that is dynamic good target publicity

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, crop: better fine information

Bing Pixel 5, exemplary range that is dynamic low target publicity

Bing Pixel 5, crop: good information however with sound visible

The Xperia 5 II handles the noise-versus-texture tradeoff well. With fairly noise that is low all images, Sony’s device is much closer to our top-ranked smartphones for this attribute. Slight noise that is chromatic noticeable in many pictures at close assessment, but general it is a lot better than a great many other products for sound. The amount of information is usually appropriate in Xperia 5 II pictures, also it really outperformed the Xperia 1 II within our standard lab dimensions. A loss of information in fine textures and motion blur on going topics means it is not exactly since impressive as the greatest of this type, nevertheless the Sony device manages to carry in to detail that is enough satisfy most users.

The Xperia 5 II performed better than the Xperia 1 II for autofocus in our objective lab tests, too, but speeds that are focusing fairly sluggish atlanta divorce attorneys condition. Autofocus problems in outside conditions and depth that is limited of also negatively affected the Xperia 5 II’s autofocus score.

We applied penalties to the score for color quantization, hue shift, ringing, loss of acutance, and ghosting artifacts. The hue shift affecting the color of skies in HDR shots is the most obvious. The Xperia 5 II also displays fractionally more vignetting and loss of sharpness towards the corners compared to the Xperia 1 II.

Sony devices still have some ways to go to improve their photography capabilities night. Restricted range that is dynamic nightscapes often leads to significant highlight clipping, and that yellow white balance becomes more problematic. The flash ensures night that is well-exposed with a top amount of information about the subject, but once again, restricted powerful range and hot white stability are obvious. Turn the flash down and backgrounds are exposed better, but both publicity and information are particularly low in the subject that is main

Sony Xperia 5 II, good publicity indoors, with bold color and somewhat hot white balance

Sony Xperia 5 II, crop: sound is well managed in many shots that are low-light.

Sony Xperia 5 II, nightscapes show restricted {dynamic range and|ra yellowish color cast

Sony Xperia 5 II, crop: information is low but sound is fairly well managed.

The Xperia 5 II provides performance that is similar tele-lens shots as the Xperia 1 II overall, but autofocus and white balance aren’t quite as stable. It’s best at close range, where target exposures are accurate and color is vivid. Detail is at its best at close range, but remains low compared to the best tele-lens performers at all zoom distances. Dynamic range is also limited and color is slightly undersaturated at medium and zoom that is long.

The ultra-wide module provides the exact same quality that is overall the Xperia 1 II. Exposures are generally accurate, but color is a little underwhelming when compared to the camera that is main. Sound is usually well managed within the center, but edges that are noisy some color fringing and anamorphosis distortion are visible towards the corners.

Despite the lack of a ToF sensor, the Xperia 5 II matches the Xperia 1 II for bokeh shots. Slight edge artifacts are visible, but depth estimation is generally accurate. Limited range that is dynamic some publicity instabilities tend to be more apparent in bokeh shots set alongside the most readily useful devices we’ve tested, nevertheless.

Sony Xperia 5 II, close-range zoom (50 mm) display accurate target publicity and color that is bold.

Sony Xperia 5 II, crop: fairly low information but appropriate sound

Sony Xperia 5 II, ultra-wide shots provide accurate target publicity but color that is slightly underwhelming.

Sony Xperia 5 II, crop: color fringing, loud sides, and distortion towards the corners

The Xperia 5 II takes a step that is notable for video image quality compared to the Mark I. Its strengths again center around bold color rendering, with particularly pleasant white balance in outdoor videos, and a good balance between texture and noise. Video exposure is better in well-balanced lighting, with limited range that is dynamic low target exposures often noticed in challenging high-contrast conditions.

Colors are bright and vivid in the open air, with accurate balance that is white but warmish color casts are more prevalent in indoor and low light videos. Levels of noise remain acceptable in most videos and detail is good for the part that is most, too. There’s a bit of a dip in texture rendering in interior videos, however it’s just in low light that a loss that is problematic of and increase in noise start to become obvious. Video and stabilization autofocus stay areas for continued development, nonetheless. Some motion that is residual evident in most of the Sony Xperia 5 II videos, together with flickering and local noise artifacts. Autofocus tracking is outdoors that are mainly efficient but we experienced regular instabilities both in interior and low-light conditions.


Sony Xperia 5 II, interior video clip: target exposures are good in balanced illumination and colors are vivid in many outside and interior videos, but powerful range is limited in high-contrast conditions.

Conclusion

If you are able to live with a somewhat smaller, lower-resolution display, the Xperia 5 II is a superb value option to the Xperia 1 II. The triple digital camera provides a lot of shooting options, and both stills and movie quality have actually enhanced because the Mark 1. generally speaking, image quality fits the pricier Xperia 1 II’s, with low sound and good color the main element strengths of this camera that is main. There are some niggles with dynamic range, detail, and autofocus, but for the part that is most the Xperia 5 II places in a reliable performance against competitors in the same cost bracket. Increase that the draw of a processor that is high-end and the Sony Xperia 5 II starts to look like an attractive option.

Pros
• Well controlled noise in most photos and* that is videos(
• Accurate level estimation in bokeh* that is photos(
• Vivid color in many tele that is close-range
• neutral balance that is white outside videos
• Accurate flash publicity in portraits(* night)
• Good information in most* that is videos(
• appropriate noise in many videos

Cons

• Limited picture and movie dynamic range in high-contrast conditions
• Slight autofocus problems in picture and video clip
• Inaccurate epidermis tone rendering in photos
• noticeable artifacts in many* that are photos(
• Chromatic noise in low-light videos
• Desaturated color in medium- and long-range lens that is tele
• Ineffective video clip stabilization
• Outer industry sound in ultra-wide shots
• Flickering artifacts in videos

.sticky-column {
place: gluey;
top: 80px;
height: calc(100vh – 4rem);
overflow-y: automobile;
}

/* Hide scrollbar for Chrome, Safari and Opera */
.sticky-column::-webkit-scrollbar {
display: none;
}

/* Hide scrollbar for IE, Edge and Firefox */
.sticky-column {
-ms-overflow-style: none; /* IE and Edge */
scrollbar-width: none; /* Firefox */
}

#scroll-summary {
padding-left: 0px;
list-style: none;
margin-top: -3px;
}
#scroll-summary li {
margin-bottom: 6px;
line-height: 16px;
}

#scroll-summary li a {
color: #555555;
font-size: 14px;
margin-left: -5px;
padding-left: 5px;
cursor: pointer;
}

#scroll-summary li.active>a,
#scroll-summary .second-layer li:hover>a,
#scroll-summary>li:hover>a {
border-left: 3px solid #1d3760;
color: #1d3760;
}

#scroll-summary .second-layer {
list-style: none;
margin: 5px 0 0 15px;
}

#scroll-summary .second-layer li a {
font-size: 13px;
}

  • Test summary
    • Conclusion

      Latest posts